<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools of the Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stevo. The 5D MkII seems quite good so far - I mainly bought it for some commercial work I&#039;m doing that could benefit from the full-frame and high-MP count.  
 
I have a 40D as well and if I were in the market for a APS-C body, would probably choose the 40D over the 50D. 
 
Canon does have a 16-35mm f2.8. I&#039;m happy with the f4, as I shoot stopped down most of the time so don&#039;t really need f2.8 for my wide angle. I have a 50mm and 100mm that&#039;ll allow me to shoot at 2.8, so that&#039;s all I really need. If I shot sports more often I&#039;d probably look at getting the 70-200mm in f2.8, but it&#039;s not really worth it for the minimal amount of sport shooting I do. 
 
A Spyder or other type of hardware calibrator is essential in my opinion. It is impossible to properly calibrate by eye only, and IMO, a color managed workflow is more important than pro-level glass or new bodies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stevo. The 5D MkII seems quite good so far &#8211; I mainly bought it for some commercial work I&#039;m doing that could benefit from the full-frame and high-MP count.  </p>
<p>I have a 40D as well and if I were in the market for a APS-C body, would probably choose the 40D over the 50D. </p>
<p>Canon does have a 16-35mm f2.8. I&#039;m happy with the f4, as I shoot stopped down most of the time so don&#039;t really need f2.8 for my wide angle. I have a 50mm and 100mm that&#039;ll allow me to shoot at 2.8, so that&#039;s all I really need. If I shot sports more often I&#039;d probably look at getting the 70-200mm in f2.8, but it&#039;s not really worth it for the minimal amount of sport shooting I do. </p>
<p>A Spyder or other type of hardware calibrator is essential in my opinion. It is impossible to properly calibrate by eye only, and IMO, a color managed workflow is more important than pro-level glass or new bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-5115</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-5115</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stevo. The 5D MkII seems quite good so far - I mainly bought it for some commercial work I&#039;m doing that could benefit from the full-frame and high-MP count.  
 
I have a 40D as well and if I were in the market for a APS-C body, would probably choose the 40D over the 50D. 
 
Canon does have a 16-35mm f2.8. I&#039;m happy with the f4, as I shoot stopped down most of the time so don&#039;t really need f2.8 for my wide angle. I have a 50mm and 100mm that&#039;ll allow me to shoot at 2.8, so that&#039;s all I really need. If I shot sports more often I&#039;d probably look at getting the 70-200mm in f2.8, but it&#039;s not really worth it for the minimal amount of sport shooting I do. 
 
A Spyder or other type of hardware calibrator is essential in my opinion. It is impossible to properly calibrate by eye only, and IMO, a color managed workflow is more important than pro-level glass or new bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stevo. The 5D MkII seems quite good so far &#8211; I mainly bought it for some commercial work I&#039;m doing that could benefit from the full-frame and high-MP count.  </p>
<p>I have a 40D as well and if I were in the market for a APS-C body, would probably choose the 40D over the 50D. </p>
<p>Canon does have a 16-35mm f2.8. I&#039;m happy with the f4, as I shoot stopped down most of the time so don&#039;t really need f2.8 for my wide angle. I have a 50mm and 100mm that&#039;ll allow me to shoot at 2.8, so that&#039;s all I really need. If I shot sports more often I&#039;d probably look at getting the 70-200mm in f2.8, but it&#039;s not really worth it for the minimal amount of sport shooting I do. </p>
<p>A Spyder or other type of hardware calibrator is essential in my opinion. It is impossible to properly calibrate by eye only, and IMO, a color managed workflow is more important than pro-level glass or new bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, Craig. You got the new 5D MkII?  You like? The 50D came out two weeks after I bought my 40D. I wasn&#039;t impressed.   
 
I would like the 17-40 f/4L but was thinking the aperture could be too restrictive. My 24-105 f/4L is okay but I wish it was f/2.8 sometimes. I think Canon has a 16-35 in 2.8. 
 
I really want one of the Spyder calibrators. That may be my only big photographic purchase this year. I just drop a ton on a new computer.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, Craig. You got the new 5D MkII?  You like? The 50D came out two weeks after I bought my 40D. I wasn&#039;t impressed.   </p>
<p>I would like the 17-40 f/4L but was thinking the aperture could be too restrictive. My 24-105 f/4L is okay but I wish it was f/2.8 sometimes. I think Canon has a 16-35 in 2.8. </p>
<p>I really want one of the Spyder calibrators. That may be my only big photographic purchase this year. I just drop a ton on a new computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, Craig. You got the new 5D MkII?  You like? The 50D came out two weeks after I bought my 40D. I wasn&#039;t impressed.   
 
I would like the 17-40 f/4L but was thinking the aperture could be too restrictive. My 24-105 f/4L is okay but I wish it was f/2.8 sometimes. I think Canon has a 16-35 in 2.8. 
 
I really want one of the Spyder calibrators. That may be my only big photographic purchase this year. I just drop a ton on a new computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, Craig. You got the new 5D MkII?  You like? The 50D came out two weeks after I bought my 40D. I wasn&#039;t impressed.   </p>
<p>I would like the 17-40 f/4L but was thinking the aperture could be too restrictive. My 24-105 f/4L is okay but I wish it was f/2.8 sometimes. I think Canon has a 16-35 in 2.8. </p>
<p>I really want one of the Spyder calibrators. That may be my only big photographic purchase this year. I just drop a ton on a new computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Carrie. If you need help or advice with lenses, flashes etc, let me know. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Carrie. If you need help or advice with lenses, flashes etc, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Carrie. If you need help or advice with lenses, flashes etc, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Carrie. If you need help or advice with lenses, flashes etc, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>I agree with Todd. I&#039;m positively drooling right now. Sadly, my gear is nowhere near to being a collection. However, I am in the market for a new lens this year and an external flash. Thanks. Now I&#039;ve got something to start with! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Todd. I&#039;m positively drooling right now. Sadly, my gear is nowhere near to being a collection. However, I am in the market for a new lens this year and an external flash. Thanks. Now I&#039;ve got something to start with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>I agree with Todd. I&#039;m positively drooling right now. Sadly, my gear is nowhere near to being a collection. However, I am in the market for a new lens this year and an external flash. Thanks. Now I&#039;ve got something to start with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Todd. I&#039;m positively drooling right now. Sadly, my gear is nowhere near to being a collection. However, I am in the market for a new lens this year and an external flash. Thanks. Now I&#039;ve got something to start with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>Insurance in Taiwan is a tricky thing but if you&#039;re persistent and the things have a high enough value it&#039;s possible. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurance in Taiwan is a tricky thing but if you&#039;re persistent and the things have a high enough value it&#039;s possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfimages</title>
		<link>http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/2009/02/tools-of-the-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>cfimages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigfergusonimages.com/?p=456#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>Insurance in Taiwan is a tricky thing but if you&#039;re persistent and the things have a high enough value it&#039;s possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurance in Taiwan is a tricky thing but if you&#039;re persistent and the things have a high enough value it&#039;s possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.622 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-31 18:47:36 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
